You say 100 series with the 4.5L straight 6, mine is a 105 with the 4.5L straight 6 engine (105 has a solid beam front axle), the 100 series petrol engine is the 4.7L V8 as far as I'm aware in Oz. So your probably looking at a 105. If your going to mainly use the vehicle on the road, and for towing, it might be worth comparing the 100 series Land Cruiser 100 2006. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser L6 DIESEL Manual 5 Speed Sport Utility A simple & effecive way to track fuel consumption Real fuel consumption of Toyota Land Cruiser 4.2 TD (HDJ 100) (204 Hp) Automatic 1998-2017 in different conditions. The data is based on the users of the inCarDoc application. 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser. 5 door off-road vehicle F4 5M 2694 cm3/164.4 cuin 163 PS 161 bhp 120 kW 288.0 CO2. 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser Automatic. 5 door off-road vehicle F4 6A 2755 cm3/168.1 cuin 176 PS 174 bhp 130 kW 194.0 CO2. 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser Automatic. 8.3 gal/100 mi. 11.6. $4,500. 24.8 barrels/yr. 741 grams/mile. Range not available. Page 1. Fuel economy of the 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser. 1984 to present Buyer's Guide to Fuel Efficient Cars and Trucks. Estimates of gas mileage, greenhouse gas emissions, safety ratings, and air pollution ratings for new and used cars and trucks. This Toyota is quite costly - it can be purchased (in Latvia) for around 24 000 €. Users calculated Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 cost of ownership for this generation, got average 5500 € cost per year and 0.44 € cost per one kilometer. Fuel costs were estimated at around 54%, while repair and maintenance costs - around 18% from total. The answers may well be somewhere on the forum BUT if I may, let me ask the owners of Land Cruisers: [Petrol first] WHAT are the avg fuel consumption figures for: (a) Land Cruiser 100 V8. (b) Land Cruiser pick up OR S/wagon with 4.0 V6 enjin. Cc) Land Cruiser with the 4.5 petrol engine. And then the Diesel 4.2 [turbo] diesel [I suppose they are Toyota Land Cruiser 200 Series But the real benefit of the turbo-diesel is its relative fuel economy which should see it use about 40 per cent less juice than the petrol in normal running and Its fuel-efficient nature makes it an excellent choice for drivers seeking a vehicle that can cover long distances while minimizing fuel consumption. Overall, the Land Cruiser's fuel average of approximately 41.2 mpg (US) or 5.7 liters per 100 kilometers highlights its ability to provide efficient fuel usage, making it suitable for both The Land Cruiser gets the win in terms of engine options, power, and interior luxury (older models). The Patrol wins when it comes to fuel economy, acceleration, build quality, offroading ability, and price. Both are excellent vehicles for overlanding and you should consider the aspects discussed above. bKrG7.